top of page

Deferred Fee arrangements available.  Learn More »

Transparent legal fees.

Justeen Dormer

Principal Lawyer
ABOUT JUSTEEN


Justeen Dormer began her career at Ashurst, a top tier law firm, where she built a strong foundation in complex dispute resolution. As Principal Lawyer and Director of Dormer Stanhope, she leads a boutique firm founded on a single principle: top tier legal expertise delivered with personal client service. Her career spans nearly three decades, and she brings the strategic depth usually associated with major national firms to a practice where clients deal with her directly. That is the Dormer Stanhope advantage. Clients get the rigour of a top tier lawyer with the hands on attention only a boutique firm can offer.


At Dormer Stanhope, the client and lawyer relationship comes first. Justeen leads a capable team of senior associates, graduate lawyers, paralegals, and expert consultants, including a former Ashurst Partner. Every matter receives her direct oversight and strategic input. Clients have the benefit of Justeen's experience from the first meeting through to resolution.


Justeen has practised across many areas of law, and that breadth shapes how she works today. Succession matters rarely sit in isolation. They carry tax, commercial, property, and family threads, and Justeen reads all of them. She has now focused her practice on succession law, and recently completed a Master of Laws (Applied Law) majoring in Wills and Estates and Estate Planning to formalise that focus.


Dormer Stanhope Team Member
CREDENTIALS


Qualifications and memberships

TRACK RECORD


Selected Cases

SELECTED CASES

  • Mackinlay v Holliday (No 2) [2023] NSWSC 1024

  • Mackinlay v Holliday [2023] NSWSC 949

  • Nelson v Health Care Complaints Commission (No 2) (Costs) [2023] NSWCATOD 93

  • Nelson v Health Care Complaints Commission [2023] NSWCATOD 5

  • JS and SD v Nationwide News Pty Ltd, Hornsby Local Court Unreported decision, Magistrate Denes, 17 December 2021, non-publication and suppression order for high-profile criminal case

  • In the matter of Pak Brothers Pty Ltd [2021] NSWSC 1247

  • Moriah War Memorial College Association v Augustine Robert Nosti [2020] NSWSC 942

  • Moriah War Memorial College v Nosti [2020] NSWSC 603

  • In the matter of Australian Worldwide Pty Ltd [2019] NSWSC 1475

  • Burton v Prior (No 2) [2019] NSWSC 518

  • Burton v Prior [2019] NSWSC 518

  • Australian Worldwide Pty Ltd v AW Exports Pty Ltd [2018] NSWSC 1632

  • In the matter of Australian Worldwide Pty Ltd [2017] NSWSC 1641

  • Turnbull v Turnbull [2017] NSWSC 1316

  • Cassaniti v Ruse NSW Pty Limited [2017] NSWSC 499

  • Cassaniti v Ruse NSW Pty Ltd [2017] NSWCA 285

  • Armstrong Strategic Management and Marketing Pty Limited v Expense Reduction Analysts Group Pty Ltd (No 10) [2017] NSWSC 16

  • Esplanade Wollongong Unit Trust v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2017] NSWCATAD 15

  • Mortimer v Lusink & Ors [2017] QCA 1

  • Armstrong Strategic Management and Marketing Pty Limited v Expense Reduction Analysts Group Pty Ltd (No 9) [2016] NSWSC 1005

  • Kaspersky Lab UK Ltd v Hemisphere Technologies [2016] NSWSC 147, stay application pursuant to section 7 of the International Arbitration Act 1974 (Cth) and request for arbitration pursuant to the Institute of Stockholm Arbitration Centre rules

  • Mortimer v Lusink & Ors [2016] QSC 119

  • Kafataris v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation [2015] FCA 874

  • R v Pratten (No 15) [2015] NSWSC 573

  • R v Pratten (No 14) [2015] NSWSC 457

  • Esplanade Wollongong Pty Limited v Commissioner of State Revenue [2015] NSWCATAD 228

  • Hua Wang Bank Berhad v Commissioner of Taxation (No 17) [2015] FCA 72

  • LHRC v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation (No 4) [2015] FCA 70

  • Channel Pastoral Holdings Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation [2015] FCAFC 57

  • LHRC v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation (No 3) [2015) FCA 52

  • Russell Gould Pty Ltd v Ramangkura (No 2) [2015] NSWCA 14

  • Hua Wang Bank Berhad v Commissioner of Taxation (No 16) [2014] FCA 1407

  • Allan J Heasman Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation [2014] FCA 1282

  • McGrouther v Commissioner of Taxation [2014] FCA 1102

  • LHRC v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation [2014] FCA 388

  • Armstrong Strategic Management and Marketing v Expense Reduction Analysis Group [2013] NSWSC 1702

  • Hua Wang Bank Berhad v Commissioner of Taxation (No 15) [2013] FCA 1124

  • Hua Wang Bank Berhad v Commissioner of Taxation (No 14) [2013] FCA 1096

  • Hua Wang Bank Berhad v Commissioner of Taxation (No 13) [2013] FCA 1095

  • Hua Wang Bank Berhad v Commissioner of Taxation (No 12) [2013] FCA 1091

  • Hua Wang Bank Berhad v Commissioner of Taxation (No 11) [2013] FCA 1055

  • Hua Wang Bank Berhad v Commissioner of Taxation (No 9) [2013] FCA 1022

  • Hua Wang Bank Berhad v Commissioner of Taxation (No 8) [2013] FCA 1021

  • Hua Wang Bank Berhad v Commissioner of Taxation (No 6) [2013] FCA 992

  • Armstrong Strategic Management and Marketing Pty Ltd v Expense Reduction Analysts Group Pty Ltd; Expense Reduction Analysts Group Pty Limited v Armstrong Strategic Management and Marketing Pty Limited [2012] NSWCA 430

  • Armstrong Strategic Management and Marketing Pty Limited & Ors v Expense Reduction Analysts Group Pty Ltd & Ors [2012] NSWSC 393

bottom of page